Mastering Options Futures and AMP, Advanced Data Feeds, and APIs

Bryan Downing
3 days ago
24 min read

Introduction: The Evolution of the Independent Trader

The landscape of professional trading has undergone a seismic shift. No longer is the domain reserved for institutions with sprawling trading floors and multi-million-dollar budgets. The rise of electronic trading, direct market access (DMA) brokers, and sophisticated yet affordable technology has democratized the markets. At the forefront of this revolution is the ability to trade the most liquid and diverse markets in the world: options futures and CME.

For the serious retail trader or small fund, the choice of brokerage, data feed, and trading platform is not merely a matter of preference; it is a foundational strategic decision. This article provides an exhaustive guide for traders looking to leverage the unique advantages of AMP Futures, understand the critical differences between the two premier data providers—CQG and Rithmic—navigate the costs of essential market data, and harness the power of programming via C++ and Python APIs to build a competitive edge.

Part 1: The AMP Futures Advantage – A Broker Built for Performance and Flexibility

AMP Futures stands as a pillar in the world of direct market access (DMA) brokers, specifically catering to active traders, algorithmic developers, and professionals who demand more than a standard retail interface. Its core value proposition revolves around three pillars: cost efficiency, technological flexibility, and direct market access.

1.1. Unparalleled Cost Efficiency and Margin Rates

For active futures traders, transaction costs are a primary determinant of profitability. AMP is renowned for its ultra-competitive commission and fee structure.

Low Commissions: AMP offers some of the lowest all-in rates (commission + exchange fees) in the industry. While rates can vary, traders can typically expect to pay between $0.29 to $0.65 per side (per round turn) for most major futures contracts like the E-mini S&P 500 (ES), crude oil (CL), and the 10-year Treasury Note (ZN). This low overhead is crucial for high-frequency scalpers and those trading large volumes.
Day Trading Margins: This is perhaps AMP's most significant advantage. AMP provides exceptionally low intraday (day trading) margin requirements. For example, while the exchange-mandated initial margin for an ES contract might be over $12,000, AMP's day trade margin could be as low as $400-$500. This allows traders to achieve significantly higher leverage and capital efficiency, meaning a $10,000 account could control a much larger notional value. It is a double-edged sword: while it amplifies potential gains, it also dramatically increases risk, necessitating rigorous risk management.

1.2. Technological Agnosticism and Platform Choice

Unlike brokers that force you into a proprietary platform, AMP operates on a "bring your own platform" (BYOP) model. They act as a gateway, providing you with the necessary credentials to connect to a wide array of third-party trading software. This freedom is invaluable.

Supported Platforms: Traders can choose from a vast ecosystem, including:
- Sierra Chart: A powerful, cost-effective charting and trading platform highly favored for its stability, customizability, and integrated study system.
- Quantower: A modern, user-friendly platform with advanced charting, DOM, and analytics tools, often offered for free with an AMP account.
- Trading Technologies (TT): An institutional-grade platform known for its speed and robust tools, accessible to retail traders through AMP.
- NinjaTrader: A popular platform with a strong focus on strategy development and backtesting.
The Advantage: This model future-proofs your trading. If a better platform emerges, you are not locked in. You can switch software without the monumental hassle of moving your brokerage account.

1.3. True Direct Market Access (DMA)

AMP provides true DMA, meaning your orders are routed directly to the exchange's matching engine without being internalized or handled by a dealing desk. This results in:

Transparency: You see the actual market depth (Level 2 data) and trade directly with other participants on the exchange.
Speed: DMA eliminates the latency introduced by a dealing desk, leading to faster order execution and fill times—a critical factor for scalpers and algorithmic traders.
No Conflict of Interest: Since AMP is not trading against you, their incentive is purely based on your trading volume (commissions), aligning their success with your ability to trade successfully.

1.4. The Critical Addition of Options on Futures

While AMP is famous for futures, its support for options on futures is a game-changer for sophisticated strategies. Trading options through AMP unlocks a new dimension of risk management and speculative opportunities.

Advantages of Combining Futures and Options with AMP:

Defined-Risk Strategies: Unlike futures, where losses can be theoretically unlimited, buying options involves a known, maximum loss (the premium paid). This allows traders to take a view on market direction or volatility with strictly managed risk.
Non-Directional Strategies: Options enable traders to profit from other market conditions beyond just price movement.
- Volatility Trading: Strategies like straddles and strangles can profit from large price moves in either direction, ideal for events like FOMC announcements or CPI reports.
- Time Decay (Theta): Selling options allows traders to collect premium and profit from the erosion of time value (theta decay), as in iron condors or credit spreads.
Enhanced Hedging: A futures portfolio can be precisely hedged using options. For example, an investor long soybean futures could buy a put option to protect against a price decline, effectively creating a collar strategy. This hedge has a known cost and doesn't require the constant monitoring of a stop-loss order.
Leverage with Capped Risk: While futures offer high leverage with uncapped risk, buying options offers high leverage with risk limited to the premium. This is a powerful way to speculate on large moves with a known downside.
Capital Efficiency: Certain complex options positions can be executed for a net debit or credit that is far less than the margin required for an equivalent futures position.

By offering a robust infrastructure for both futures and options, AMP empowers traders to graduate from simple directional bets to multi-legged, sophisticated strategies that can adapt to any market environment.

Part 2: The Data Feed Dilemma: CQG vs. Rithmic – A Microscopic Comparison

The data feed is the central nervous system of a trading operation. For AMP traders, the two primary choices are CQG and Rithmic. Both are top-tier, institutional-grade providers, but they have distinct philosophies, strengths, and weaknesses. The choice between them is often the most consequential technical decision a trader makes.

2.1. CQG: The Established, Integrated Powerhouse

CQG has been a market leader for decades. It offers an integrated solution where the data, charting, and order routing are part of a cohesive, well-tested ecosystem.

Pros of CQG:

Superior Integrated Charting and Analytics: If you plan to use the CQG desktop application (CQG QTrader or CQG IC), the charting quality, speed of rendering, and breadth of built-in technical studies are arguably best-in-class. The integration between the chart and the order entry windows is seamless.
Excellent Market Depth (Time & Sales): CQG's historical and real-time Time & Sales data is highly regarded. The presentation of the data flow is clear and fast, which is vital for tape-reading strategies.
Robust and Stable Infrastructure: CQG's network is known for its exceptional reliability and uptime. It's a "set it and forget it" solution that professionals trust for mission-critical trading.
Strong Order Routing and Fill Quality: CQG's order routing logic is sophisticated, designed to seek optimal fills, especially for larger orders. Its spread-trading functionality is also highly advanced.
Comprehensive API Support: The CQG API is well-documented and supports a wide range of functionality for both market data and order execution.

Cons of CQG:

Perceived Latency: While extremely fast, among the ultra-low-latency community (specifically scalpers), CQG is sometimes perceived as being a few milliseconds slower than Rithmic in raw data delivery and order execution. For 99% of traders, this difference is imperceptible and irrelevant.
Less "Raw" Data Feed: CQG does some preprocessing of the data before it is delivered to the client. For those who want the absolute rawest feed from the exchange to perform their own data conditioning, this can be a minor drawback.
Cost: CQG's data feed packages can be slightly more expensive than Rithmic's basic offerings.

2.2. Rithmic: The Raw, Low-Latency Specialist

Rithmic was built from the ground up with one primary focus: speed. It is the data feed of choice for scalpers, high-frequency algorithmic traders, and anyone for whom every millisecond counts.

Pros of Rithmic:

Ultra-Low Latency: This is Rithmic's flagship feature. The R-Trader Pro API and its data packets are engineered for minimal delay. The data is incredibly "clean" and fast, providing a tangible edge in fast-moving markets.
The "Rithmic Router": A key advantage is Rithmic's order routing logic. It allows for unparalleled control, including the ability to specify a particular exchange gateway for order entry. This can be critical for minimizing latency to a specific exchange's matching engine.
Truly Raw Data Feed: Rithmic delivers the data in a much rawer form than CQG. This is preferred by algorithmic traders who want to build their own data conditioning and market reconstruction logic without any intermediary processing.
Excellent Market Depth Visualization: The Rithmic DOM (Depth of Market) in platforms like Sierra Chart is renowned for its stability and precision, displaying order book changes with exceptional speed.
Competitive Pricing: Rithmic's core data feeds are often priced very competitively, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious traders who still demand high performance.

Cons of Rithmic:

Less Polished Integrated Platform: The standalone R|Trader platform, while functional, lacks the polished charting and analytical depth of CQG's desktop applications. Most Rithmic users pair the data feed with a third-party platform like Sierra Chart or Quantower for charting.
Steeper Learning Curve: The raw nature of the data and the advanced configuration options for the router can be intimidating for beginners. It requires a deeper technical understanding to set up and optimize.
API Complexity: The R-Trader Pro API is extremely powerful but is also considered more complex to implement than the CQG API, especially for less experienced programmers.

2.3. Summary: Which One is Right for You?

Choose CQG if: You value an integrated, stable, and feature-rich environment. You are a swing trader, position trader, or use complex charting and analytics heavily within a single platform. Reliability and ease of use are your top priorities.
Choose Rithmic if: You are a scalper, algorithmic trader, or anyone for whom latency is the primary concern. You use a third-party platform like Sierra Chart for charting and want the rawest, fastest data feed with maximum control over order routing.

Ultimately, both are excellent choices. The decision hinges on your specific trading style and technical requirements.

Part 3: Demystifying CME Market Data Costs

A common point of confusion for new traders is the cost of real-time market data. It's essential to understand that these fees are set by the exchanges (like CME, ICE, etc.) and passed through by the broker/data provider. There are two main components: the exchange data fees and the provider's admin fee.

For trading CME Group futures and options, you typically need two data subscriptions:

CME Group Top of Book (Level 1): Provides the best bid and ask (BBO) and last traded price. This is the minimum required to see live prices.
CME Group Market Depth (Level 2): Provides the full order book, showing all resting orders at different price levels beyond the best bid/ask. This is essential for trading the DOM.

3.1. Breakdown of Total Cost for CME Level 2 Data

Here is a detailed breakdown of the typical monthly fees. Prices are subject to change by the exchanges, so always verify with AMP or the exchange website.

CME Group Real-Time Market Data Fee (Professional): ~$110 per month.
- Note: The "Professional" designation is crucial. If you are classified as a professional (generally defined as someone who uses the data for commercial purposes, like managing money or trading for a firm), you must pay the professional rate. Most active retail traders who are trading for their own account qualify as "Non-Professional" but must self-certify as such.
CME Group Market Depth (Level 2) Add-On Fee: ~$30 per month.
Data Provider Admin Fee (AMP/CQG/Rithmic): This is a fee charged by the provider for hosting, distributing, and supporting the data feed. This typically ranges from $15 to $30 per month.

Total Estimated Monthly Cost for CME Level 2 Data (Professional):

$110 (Level 1) + $30 (Level 2) + $25 (Avg. Admin Fee) = Approximately $165 per month.

Total Estimated Monthly Cost for CME Level 2 Data (Non-Professional):

The non-professional rates are significantly lower, often a small fraction of the professional cost. A non-professional might pay a bundled fee of ~$10-$15 total for both Level 1 and Level 2 data, plus the admin fee. Total cost would be approximately $25 - $45 per month.

Important Considerations:

Bundles are Cheaper: Exchanges often bundle related products. The "CME Group Premium Plan" might include data for CME, CBOT, NYMEX, and COMEX futures and options at a bundled rate that is cheaper than buying each individually.
Waivers: If your trading volume reaches a certain threshold, the exchange will often waive the data fees. This is common for very active traders.
You Must Subscribe: You cannot legally trade with real-time data without a subscription. Using unsubscribed real-time data is a violation of exchange rules.

Before trading, consult with AMP to get the exact, current fee schedule and complete the necessary non-professional certification form if applicable.

Part 4: Harnessing Automation: An Overview of C++ and Python APIs

For traders looking to automate their strategies, conduct systematic research, or build custom analytics tools, Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are indispensable. Both CQG and Rithmic offer robust APIs.

4.1. The CQG API

The CQG API is a comprehensive, well-structured interface that supports a wide range of programming languages, including C++, C#, Java, and Python (via a COM interface or a dedicated wrapper).

Key Features and Detail:

Architecture: It is based on a client-server model. Your application (the client) connects to the CQG Gateway (the server), which handles the heavy lifting of market data processing and order management.
Functionality:
- Market Data: Subscribe to real-time and historical time & sales, bar data, and market depth.
- Order Management: Send, modify, and cancel orders; request order and position status.
- Fundamental Data: Access to news and fundamental data feeds.
Python Support (via CQG IC): The most common way to use Python with CQG is through the win32com library, which allows Python to interact with the CQG Integrated Client (IC) as a COM object.
- Example Python Snippet (Conceptual):

python

View all

import win32com.client

# Create a connection to the CQG IC application

cqg = win32com.client.Dispatch("CQG.CQGCEL.1")

# Log in (credentials would be handled securely)

cqg.Logon("", "", "", "")

# Create a data subscription for the ES futures contract

data_subscription = cqg.CreateDataSubscription("ESZ3")

data_subscription.OnNewData = my_data_handler_function  # Assign your custom function

# Define a function to handle incoming ticks

def my_data_handler_function(symbol, data_type, value):

    if data_type == "Last":

        print(f"Last Price for {symbol}: {value}")

# Order entry would involve similar object-based interactions

Pros: Relatively easy to get started for Python users familiar with COM. Leverages the stability of the CQG IC.
Cons: The COM interface can feel archaic and is Windows-specific. It may not be as performant as a native socket-based API.
C++ Support: CQG provides a native C++ API, which is the choice for maximum performance and low-latency applications.
- Detail: It involves working with a library file (cgqapi.lib or .dll) and header files. The developer must handle the connection lifecycle, message parsing, and asynchronous events.
- Pros: Ultimate speed and control. Direct socket connection to the gateway.
- Cons: Significant complexity. Requires expert-level knowledge of C++, networking, and multithreading.

4.2. The Rithmic R|API (R-Trader Pro API)

The Rithmic API is designed for performance. It is a lower-level, socket-based API that provides direct, raw access to the market data and order routing infrastructure.

Key Features and Detail:

Architecture: The API connects your application directly to Rithmic's servers via TCP/IP sockets. The data is delivered in a very compact, binary format for speed.
Functionality: It offers all the core features: real-time market data, historical data, and full order management, including the advanced routing controls Rithmic is known for.
Python Support: Rithmic provides an official Python API. This is a significant advantage over CQG's COM-based approach, as it is a native, cross-platform solution.
- Example Python Snippet (Conceptual):

python

from rithmic import RithmicAPI

# Initialize and connect

config = {'username': 'your_user', 'password': 'your_pwd', ...}

rapi = RithmicAPI(config=config)

rapi.connect()

# Subscribe to market data for ES

rapi.subscribe_to_market_data('ESZ3')

# Define a callback function for tick data

def on_tick(tick_data):

print(f"Tick: {tick_data}")

rapi.set_market_data_callback(on_tick)

# Place an order

ticket = rapi.create_order(contract='ESZ3', order_type='LIMIT', quantity=1, price=4500.25, action='BUY')

rapi.send_order(ticket)

Pros: Modern, native Python implementation. Can run on Linux, which is preferred for stable, server-based trading systems. Excellent performance.
Cons: Still requires a good understanding of the Rithmic ecosystem and message types. The raw nature of the data means you have to handle more data conditioning yourself.
C++ Support: The R|API is fundamentally a C++ API. The provided libraries are in C++, and this is the intended path for building the fastest possible automated systems.
- Detail: Developers work with a C++ library and must implement callback functions to handle incoming messages (e.g., onTick, onOrderUpdate). The codebase is designed for high-frequency trading.
- Pros: The fastest possible connection to the Rithmic infrastructure. Essential for microsecond-sensitive strategies.
- Cons: Extremely high complexity. The learning curve is steep, and debugging can be challenging.

4.3. API Selection Guide

Choose the CQG API if: You are developing in a Windows environment, value well-structured documentation and examples, and your strategy does not require nanosecond-level optimizations. The Python/COM route is accessible for many quantitative traders.
Choose the Rithmic R|API if: Your primary concern is latency. You are comfortable with a more complex, raw data feed and are developing in C++ or prefer a native Python API on Linux for a server-based deployment.

Conclusion: Building Your Optimal Trading Infrastructure

The modern trader's advantage is no longer just about analysis; it's about infrastructure. By carefully selecting each component of your trading stack, you can assemble a powerful, personalized system that rivals institutional capabilities.

Start with the Broker: AMP Futures provides the foundational elements of low-cost, DMA, and unparalleled flexibility, all while supporting the complex world of options on futures.
Select the Data Feed with Intent: The CQG vs. Rithmic decision is strategic. Let your trading style—integrated charting vs. raw speed—be your guide.
Budget for Data Accurately: Understand the real cost of professional-grade CME Level 2 data and ensure you are correctly classified as a non-professional if applicable.
Automate with the Right API: Leverage the power of programming through either the structured CQG API or the high-performance Rithmic R|API, using Python for rapid development or C++ for ultimate speed.

This holistic approach to building your trading operation empowers you to move beyond being a mere participant in the markets and become a true architect of your own success. The tools are available; the final advantage lies in the wisdom to choose and implement them effectively.

Introduction: The Evolution of the Independent Trader

Part 1: The AMP Futures Advantage – A Broker Built for Performance and Flexibility

1.1. Unparalleled Cost Efficiency and Margin Rates

For active futures traders, transaction costs are a primary determinant of profitability. AMP is renowned for its ultra-competitive commission and fee structure.

Low Commissions: AMP offers some of the lowest all-in rates (commission + exchange fees) in the industry. While rates can vary, traders can typically expect to pay between $0.29 to $0.65 per side (per round turn) for most major futures contracts like the E-mini S&P 500 (ES), crude oil (CL), and the 10-year Treasury Note (ZN). This low overhead is crucial for high-frequency scalpers and those trading large volumes.
Day Trading Margins: This is perhaps AMP's most significant advantage. AMP provides exceptionally low intraday (day trading) margin requirements. For example, while the exchange-mandated initial margin for an ES contract might be over $12,000, AMP's day trade margin could be as low as $400-$500. This allows traders to achieve significantly higher leverage and capital efficiency, meaning a $10,000 account could control a much larger notional value. It is a double-edged sword: while it amplifies potential gains, it also dramatically increases risk, necessitating rigorous risk management.

1.2. Technological Agnosticism and Platform Choice

Supported Platforms: Traders can choose from a vast ecosystem, including:
- Sierra Chart: A powerful, cost-effective charting and trading platform highly favored for its stability, customizability, and integrated study system.
- Quantower: A modern, user-friendly platform with advanced charting, DOM, and analytics tools, often offered for free with an AMP account.
- Trading Technologies (TT): An institutional-grade platform known for its speed and robust tools, accessible to retail traders through AMP.
- NinjaTrader: A popular platform with a strong focus on strategy development and backtesting.
The Advantage: This model future-proofs your trading. If a better platform emerges, you are not locked in. You can switch software without the monumental hassle of moving your brokerage account.

1.3. True Direct Market Access (DMA)

AMP provides true DMA, meaning your orders are routed directly to the exchange's matching engine without being internalized or handled by a dealing desk. This results in:

Transparency: You see the actual market depth (Level 2 data) and trade directly with other participants on the exchange.
Speed: DMA eliminates the latency introduced by a dealing desk, leading to faster order execution and fill times—a critical factor for scalpers and algorithmic traders.
No Conflict of Interest: Since AMP is not trading against you, their incentive is purely based on your trading volume (commissions), aligning their success with your ability to trade successfully.

1.4. The Critical Addition of Options on Futures

Advantages of Combining Futures and Options with AMP:

Defined-Risk Strategies: Unlike futures, where losses can be theoretically unlimited, buying options involves a known, maximum loss (the premium paid). This allows traders to take a view on market direction or volatility with strictly managed risk.
Non-Directional Strategies: Options enable traders to profit from other market conditions beyond just price movement.
- Volatility Trading: Strategies like straddles and strangles can profit from large price moves in either direction, ideal for events like FOMC announcements or CPI reports.
- Time Decay (Theta): Selling options allows traders to collect premium and profit from the erosion of time value (theta decay), as in iron condors or credit spreads.
Enhanced Hedging: A futures portfolio can be precisely hedged using options. For example, an investor long soybean futures could buy a put option to protect against a price decline, effectively creating a collar strategy. This hedge has a known cost and doesn't require the constant monitoring of a stop-loss order.
Leverage with Capped Risk: While futures offer high leverage with uncapped risk, buying options offers high leverage with risk limited to the premium. This is a powerful way to speculate on large moves with a known downside.
Capital Efficiency: Certain complex options positions can be executed for a net debit or credit that is far less than the margin required for an equivalent futures position.

Part 2: The Data Feed Dilemma: CQG vs. Rithmic – A Microscopic Comparison

2.1. CQG: The Established, Integrated Powerhouse

CQG has been a market leader for decades. It offers an integrated solution where the data, charting, and order routing are part of a cohesive, well-tested ecosystem.

Pros of CQG:

Superior Integrated Charting and Analytics: If you plan to use the CQG desktop application (CQG QTrader or CQG IC), the charting quality, speed of rendering, and breadth of built-in technical studies are arguably best-in-class. The integration between the chart and the order entry windows is seamless.
Excellent Market Depth (Time & Sales): CQG's historical and real-time Time & Sales data is highly regarded. The presentation of the data flow is clear and fast, which is vital for tape-reading strategies.
Robust and Stable Infrastructure: CQG's network is known for its exceptional reliability and uptime. It's a "set it and forget it" solution that professionals trust for mission-critical trading.
Strong Order Routing and Fill Quality: CQG's order routing logic is sophisticated, designed to seek optimal fills, especially for larger orders. Its spread-trading functionality is also highly advanced.
Comprehensive API Support: The CQG API is well-documented and supports a wide range of functionality for both market data and order execution.

Cons of CQG:

Perceived Latency: While extremely fast, among the ultra-low-latency community (specifically scalpers), CQG is sometimes perceived as being a few milliseconds slower than Rithmic in raw data delivery and order execution. For 99% of traders, this difference is imperceptible and irrelevant.
Less "Raw" Data Feed: CQG does some preprocessing of the data before it is delivered to the client. For those who want the absolute rawest feed from the exchange to perform their own data conditioning, this can be a minor drawback.
Cost: CQG's data feed packages can be slightly more expensive than Rithmic's basic offerings.

2.2. Rithmic: The Raw, Low-Latency Specialist

Rithmic was built from the ground up with one primary focus: speed. It is the data feed of choice for scalpers, high-frequency algorithmic traders, and anyone for whom every millisecond counts.

Pros of Rithmic:

Ultra-Low Latency: This is Rithmic's flagship feature. The R-Trader Pro API and its data packets are engineered for minimal delay. The data is incredibly "clean" and fast, providing a tangible edge in fast-moving markets.
The "Rithmic Router": A key advantage is Rithmic's order routing logic. It allows for unparalleled control, including the ability to specify a particular exchange gateway for order entry. This can be critical for minimizing latency to a specific exchange's matching engine.
Truly Raw Data Feed: Rithmic delivers the data in a much rawer form than CQG. This is preferred by algorithmic traders who want to build their own data conditioning and market reconstruction logic without any intermediary processing.
Excellent Market Depth Visualization: The Rithmic DOM (Depth of Market) in platforms like Sierra Chart is renowned for its stability and precision, displaying order book changes with exceptional speed.
Competitive Pricing: Rithmic's core data feeds are often priced very competitively, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious traders who still demand high performance.

Cons of Rithmic:

Less Polished Integrated Platform: The standalone R|Trader platform, while functional, lacks the polished charting and analytical depth of CQG's desktop applications. Most Rithmic users pair the data feed with a third-party platform like Sierra Chart or Quantower for charting.
Steeper Learning Curve: The raw nature of the data and the advanced configuration options for the router can be intimidating for beginners. It requires a deeper technical understanding to set up and optimize.
API Complexity: The R-Trader Pro API is extremely powerful but is also considered more complex to implement than the CQG API, especially for less experienced programmers.

2.3. Summary: Which One is Right for You?

Choose CQG if: You value an integrated, stable, and feature-rich environment. You are a swing trader, position trader, or use complex charting and analytics heavily within a single platform. Reliability and ease of use are your top priorities.
Choose Rithmic if: You are a scalper, algorithmic trader, or anyone for whom latency is the primary concern. You use a third-party platform like Sierra Chart for charting and want the rawest, fastest data feed with maximum control over order routing.

Ultimately, both are excellent choices. The decision hinges on your specific trading style and technical requirements.

Part 3: Demystifying CME Market Data Costs

For trading CME Group futures and options, you typically need two data subscriptions:

CME Group Top of Book (Level 1): Provides the best bid and ask (BBO) and last traded price. This is the minimum required to see live prices.
CME Group Market Depth (Level 2): Provides the full order book, showing all resting orders at different price levels beyond the best bid/ask. This is essential for trading the DOM.

3.1. Breakdown of Total Cost for CME Level 2 Data

Here is a detailed breakdown of the typical monthly fees. Prices are subject to change by the exchanges, so always verify with AMP or the exchange website.

CME Group Real-Time Market Data Fee (Professional): ~$110 per month.
- Note: The "Professional" designation is crucial. If you are classified as a professional (generally defined as someone who uses the data for commercial purposes, like managing money or trading for a firm), you must pay the professional rate. Most active retail traders who are trading for their own account qualify as "Non-Professional" but must self-certify as such.
CME Group Market Depth (Level 2) Add-On Fee: ~$30 per month.
Data Provider Admin Fee (AMP/CQG/Rithmic): This is a fee charged by the provider for hosting, distributing, and supporting the data feed. This typically ranges from $15 to $30 per month.

Total Estimated Monthly Cost for CME Level 2 Data (Professional):

$110 (Level 1) + $30 (Level 2) + $25 (Avg. Admin Fee) = Approximately $165 per month.

Total Estimated Monthly Cost for CME Level 2 Data (Non-Professional):

Important Considerations:

Bundles are Cheaper: Exchanges often bundle related products. The "CME Group Premium Plan" might include data for CME, CBOT, NYMEX, and COMEX futures and options at a bundled rate that is cheaper than buying each individually.
Waivers: If your trading volume reaches a certain threshold, the exchange will often waive the data fees. This is common for very active traders.
You Must Subscribe: You cannot legally trade with real-time data without a subscription. Using unsubscribed real-time data is a violation of exchange rules.

Before trading, consult with AMP to get the exact, current fee schedule and complete the necessary non-professional certification form if applicable.

Part 4: Harnessing Automation: An Overview of C++ and Python APIs

4.1. The CQG API

The CQG API is a comprehensive, well-structured interface that supports a wide range of programming languages, including C++, C#, Java, and Python (via a COM interface or a dedicated wrapper).

Key Features and Detail:

Architecture: It is based on a client-server model. Your application (the client) connects to the CQG Gateway (the server), which handles the heavy lifting of market data processing and order management.
Functionality:
- Market Data: Subscribe to real-time and historical time & sales, bar data, and market depth.
- Order Management: Send, modify, and cancel orders; request order and position status.
- Fundamental Data: Access to news and fundamental data feeds.
Python Support (via CQG IC): The most common way to use Python with CQG is through the win32com library, which allows Python to interact with the CQG Integrated Client (IC) as a COM object.
- Example Python Snippet (Conceptual):

python

View all

import win32com.client

# Create a connection to the CQG IC application

cqg = win32com.client.Dispatch("CQG.CQGCEL.1")

# Log in (credentials would be handled securely)

cqg.Logon("", "", "", "")

# Create a data subscription for the ES futures contract

data_subscription = cqg.CreateDataSubscription("ESZ3")

data_subscription.OnNewData = my_data_handler_function # Assign your custom function

# Define a function to handle incoming ticks

def my_data_handler_function(symbol, data_type, value):

if data_type == "Last":

print(f"Last Price for {symbol}: {value}")

# Order entry would involve similar object-based interactions

Pros: Relatively easy to get started for Python users familiar with COM. Leverages the stability of the CQG IC.
Cons: The COM interface can feel archaic and is Windows-specific. It may not be as performant as a native socket-based API.
C++ Support: CQG provides a native C++ API, which is the choice for maximum performance and low-latency applications.
- Detail: It involves working with a library file (cgqapi.lib or .dll) and header files. The developer must handle the connection lifecycle, message parsing, and asynchronous events.
- Pros: Ultimate speed and control. Direct socket connection to the gateway.
- Cons: Significant complexity. Requires expert-level knowledge of C++, networking, and multithreading.

4.2. The Rithmic R|API (R-Trader Pro API)

The Rithmic API is designed for performance. It is a lower-level, socket-based API that provides direct, raw access to the market data and order routing infrastructure.

Key Features and Detail:

Architecture: The API connects your application directly to Rithmic's servers via TCP/IP sockets. The data is delivered in a very compact, binary format for speed.
Functionality: It offers all the core features: real-time market data, historical data, and full order management, including the advanced routing controls Rithmic is known for.
Python Support: Rithmic provides an official Python API. This is a significant advantage over CQG's COM-based approach, as it is a native, cross-platform solution.
- Example Python Snippet (Conceptual):

python

View all

from rithmic import RithmicAPI

# Initialize and connect

config = {'username': 'your_user', 'password': 'your_pwd', ...}

rapi = RithmicAPI(config=config)

rapi.connect()

# Subscribe to market data for ES

rapi.subscribe_to_market_data('ESZ3')

# Define a callback function for tick data

def on_tick(tick_data):

print(f"Tick: {tick_data}")

rapi.set_market_data_callback(on_tick)

# Place an order

ticket = rapi.create_order(contract='ESZ3', order_type='LIMIT', quantity=1, price=4500.25, action='BUY')

rapi.send_order(ticket)

Pros: Modern, native Python implementation. Can run on Linux, which is preferred for stable, server-based trading systems. Excellent performance.
Cons: Still requires a good understanding of the Rithmic ecosystem and message types. The raw nature of the data means you have to handle more data conditioning yourself.
C++ Support: The R|API is fundamentally a C++ API. The provided libraries are in C++, and this is the intended path for building the fastest possible automated systems.
- Detail: Developers work with a C++ library and must implement callback functions to handle incoming messages (e.g., onTick, onOrderUpdate). The codebase is designed for high-frequency trading.
- Pros: The fastest possible connection to the Rithmic infrastructure. Essential for microsecond-sensitive strategies.
- Cons: Extremely high complexity. The learning curve is steep, and debugging can be challenging.

4.3. API Selection Guide

Choose the CQG API if: You are developing in a Windows environment, value well-structured documentation and examples, and your strategy does not require nanosecond-level optimizations. The Python/COM route is accessible for many quantitative traders.
Choose the Rithmic R|API if: Your primary concern is latency. You are comfortable with a more complex, raw data feed and are developing in C++ or prefer a native Python API on Linux for a server-based deployment.

Conclusion: Building Your Optimal Trading Infrastructure

Start with the Broker: AMP Futures provides the foundational elements of low-cost, DMA, and unparalleled flexibility, all while supporting the complex world of options on futures.
Select the Data Feed with Intent: The CQG vs. Rithmic decision is strategic. Let your trading style—integrated charting vs. raw speed—be your guide.
Budget for Data Accurately: Understand the real cost of professional-grade CME Level 2 data and ensure you are correctly classified as a non-professional if applicable.
Automate with the Right API: Leverage the power of programming through either the structured CQG API or the high-performance Rithmic R|API, using Python for rapid development or C++ for ultimate speed.

Get auto trading tips and tricks from our experts. Join our newsletter now

Mastering Options Futures and AMP, Advanced Data Feeds, and APIs

Recent Posts

Comments

Quantlabs.net